2026 Ten-Point Forecast: OH-9 (U.S. House – Decisive)

2026 Ten-Point Forecast: OH-9, Derek Merrin vs. Marcy Kaptur

Derek Merrin (R) vs. Marcy Kaptur (D-inc.)

I. The Race

Derek Merrin (R) and Marcy Kaptur (D), the candidates in Ohio's 9th Congressional District

Derek Merrin (Republican) is a former member of the Ohio House of Representatives who is locked into a 2024 rematch with Kaptur, but this time with much friendlier district boundaries at his disposal.

Marcy Kaptur (Democrat) is the longest-tenured woman in Congress, and seeking a twenty-third term after barely surviving Merrin’s surge in President Trump’s statewide romp in 2024. For perspective, I turn 42 next month; Kaptur was wrapping up her first term when I was born.

II. District Geography

Map of the redrawn Ohio 9th Congressional District in northwest Ohio

Ohio’s 9th Congressional District (OH-9) occupies the northwest corner of the Buckeye State and contains Toledo as its major metro area. These boundaries have been redrawn since the 2024 election thanks to the requirements of Ohio law, and OH-9 seems to be the seat in the bipartisan arrangement that was most gift-wrapped for Republicans to take over. OH-13, held by Democrat Emilia Sykes, was close in 2024 but made bluer by the redistricting commission, and OH-1 covering the southwest corner and Cincinnati was weakened (for Democrats) a little, but probably not enough to tip over in the 2026 cycle.

The new map removed the following from OH-9:

• Sandusky County
• The northeastern edge of Wood County closest to Toledo

The map added these counties:

• Henry County (Trump +46.5%)
• Paulding County (Trump +55.9%)
• Putnam County (Trump +68.5%)

Trump won the boundaries of OH-9 as they were in 2024 by 7 points. His performance was not quite enough to get Merrin past the entrench Kaptur.

Here are the approximate recent presidential margins for the new boundaries:

• 2016 Trump +5.0%
• 2020 Trump +6.0%
• 2024 Trump +11.0%

Key Statistics

• 74.5% White, 12.0% Black, 7.2% Hispanic
• 86.0% Urban, 14.0% Rural

III. Market Assessment

Despite the geographical disadvantage, Polymarket bettors are still throwing in with Kaptur – a heavy favorite in the market.

IV. History

To write a history of OH-9 in its various shapes and descriptions over the past four decades would essentially be to write a biography of Kaptur. She has hogged the seat for far too long as a career politician posing as a public servant.

Prior to the 2024 race, and thanks to much friendlier ideologies and boundaries, Kaptur never had a close call. She often won by Pelosi margins, taking over 70% of the vote. In 2024, with Trump on his way to a +11.2% win statewide in Ohio, Kaptur barely held the line against Merrin:

OH-9 2024 U.S. House result, Kaptur vs. Merrin

2,382 votes, just 0.7%, separated her from her GOP challenger. Tom Pruss, the libertarian on the ticket, and given who is voting Democrat in OH-9, I’d bet his presence on the ticket hurt Merrin the most. Either way, Merrin is back for round two, and this time in a district with four more points of presidential margin at his back.

V. Analysis of 2026 Primary Results

Kaptur, unlike many entrenched Democrats, faced no challenger in the Democrat primary.

Merrin had to fend off a field of opponents, and prevailed by a +18.8% margin over Josh Williams, the second place finisher:

OH-9 2026 Republican primary results

The GOP primary was full of mud-slinging and personal attacks, but the candidates have moved on and backed Merrin – and so has President Trump.

VI. Polls

These polls were pulled from The New York Times:

OH-9 polling table from The New York Times

The McLaughlin poll is old, but shows a four-point lead for Merrin. A recent Democrat-sponsored poll shows a tie, which is not a good poll for Kaptur given who paid for the result. I will award a slight edge to Merrin in this category.

VII. Media Ratings

Media race ratings for OH-9

Decision Desk is a Kaptur believer, but the three other reviewing bodies I consider have the race scored a “toss-up.” Until the most recent update, Inside Elections favored Merrin, albeit narrowly.

VIII. Party Registration

Ohio does not register voters by party; however, based on similar county profiles in Pennsylvania, it is highly likely OH-9 would have a notable rightward drift in registration if we had such information.

IX. Election Considerations

Here is what I had to say in my write-up of the greatest unforced error in the race for the majority, OH-7:

Fortunately for Miller, Ohio has done a relatively strong job of sealing up election loopholes and has ensured they have control over the limited mail-in balloting that exists in the Buckeye State. I wrote up Ohio’s election details in the aftermath of the 2024 election for those of you interested in understanding how election integrity impacts races there. In short, there will be no late night ballot dumps impacting this race.

X. Summary and Election Estimate

Ohio Republicans, at fault for showing mercy to Democrats when they could have flipped three seats, got the redistricting job done enough to imperil Kaptur’s seemingly endless career. They have set OH-9 up for a clash of two worlds: MAGA-land vs. Toledo. Have a look at my proprietary mapping of the new boundaries:

Captain K proprietary precinct mapping of OH-9
Captain K Proprietary Mapping of OH-9

This map excludes some of the far northeastern portion of the district, but I’m presenting the snippet this way with clarity in mind. Those crimson-shaded precincts are what I label “Super MAGA” precincts. Trump had 66.7% or more of the vote there in 2024, and there are no signs of leftward lurching. Lucas County, the home of Toledo, even has some friendly Republican precincts (regular red shade, no leftward drift, won by Trump but with less than 66.7% of the vote), so the entire county isn’t destroyed by the urban spread.

Toledo itself has a mix of Democrat-rated precincts (blue, Trump at less than 30% of the vote and often in low single digits for overwhelmingly black precincts) and working-class precincts with rightward momentum (solid purple). In a geographic arrangement like we find in the new OH-9, Kaptur needs two things to happen to win:

• Poor turnout in the crimsons
• Massive turnout in the blues of Lucas County

Right now, Lucas County ranks 62nd out of 88 counties in Ohio, close to the bottom quarter, in terms of how much of its 2024 presidential vote count it has already turned out in 2026. To make matters worse, the turnout in Lucas County that has already happened is disproportionately from precincts less likely to overwhelmingly back Kaptur. If the city doesn’t vote, she can’t win.

The decision matrix for this race looks like this:

Keshel decision matrix for OH-9

Just as I have given Merrin the edge for inconclusive (but telling) polls, I gave Kaptur an edge for race ratings because she has just one outlet thinking she will win. Kaptur’s only real advantage is with money, a field in which she has massively benefitted because every special interest group in America is trying to save her career from what looks likely based on what I can read (and I don’t read polls).

Forecast for OH-9 House

Keshel forecast for OH-9 House

I feel fairly confident Kaptur has reached the end of the line. This seat, just like the redrawn NC-1 seat, is a must-win for Republicans if they hope to hold their majority in the House. It is too strong presidentially, with voters trending almost uniformly in the right direction, to lose unless the entire brand is weighed down with too much baggage to defend all the seats up for grabs successfully.

Democrats can take the House without holding OH-9 (and NC-1), but if they manage to keep this seat, then I don’t see them missing out on the majority. Still, the fundamentals remain – if Toledo doesn’t vote, Kaptur goes into retirement.

Seth Keshel, MBA is a Senior Fellow at the Gold Institute for International Strategy and a retired Army Captain. He publishes Captain K’s Corner on Substack.

Midterms: Bash Trump, or You’re Not Decent

Ink illustration of Derk Jan Eppink on an orange background

This article was written by Derk Jan Eppink and appeared in WNL. Midterms: Trump-bashen of je deugt niet.

With the American midterms on the menu, “commentating Netherlands” is settling in for the show. Viewers expect a range of opinions, as befits a public broadcaster, but are treated to the one uniform opinion: “Democrats must win; Republicans are crazy; Trump is a criminal.” Whoever does not share this subtle analysis is not decent either.

The Dutch debate about America has nothing to do with America, and everything to do with the Netherlands. Your opinion of America, let alone of Trump, determines where you stand and whether you are decent, and if you are not, you deserve to be met with silence. Behold the “democratic debate.”

In 2008 I lived in New York and decided to become a “Republican watcher.” A niche and at the same time lonely profession, but for me a world opened up in the “other America.” I attended the conventions in the presidential election, both the Democrats’ in Denver and the Republicans’ in Minneapolis-St. Paul.

The NOS was in Denver with a sizable delegation in rented caravans. For Barack Obama was the anointed one, awaiting canonization. At the Republicans’ convention there was a single NOS radio journalist, who left early because of a flood elsewhere.

On stage, Sarah Palin was launched as the vice-presidential candidate, and the media immediately banished her. But she voiced something that was widely felt in non-urban America, and on which the later candidate Donald Trump built: the gap between voters and Washington, DC.

In 2015 Trump launched his campaign and was immediately declared “crazy.” In Washington everyone laughed at him; the fool of the day. At his first campaign appearance, in August 2015, he flew his plane (lettered: TRUMP) over a football stadium with 30,000 people in Mobile, Alabama.

I thought: “Something is happening here, this is an American ‘Pim moment,’” and wrote in De Volkskrant (September 2, 2015): “Can Trump ultimately win? Yes he can.” The editors printed it, probably shaking their heads.

A year later, on a street in New York (coincidences do happen), I ran into Bret Stephens, head of the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. I knew him from my Brussels days as head of The Wall Street Journal Europe. He invited me to lunch. I told him Trump stood a real chance, given those reactions in the stadium. A kind of “Pim effect.”

He knew who Pim Fortuyn was and suddenly became very angry. “Trump cannot win, not a single chance: zero!” But Trump won. Stephens traded the Wall Street Journal for the New York Times. Pollsters, too, believed Trump mathematically could not win, but politics is not mathematics. The Dutch television panels were shrouded in tears that election night.

The coming midterms are Trump’s last and most difficult. That he is a narcissist everyone knows (TikTok prime minister Jetten is one too): for many politicians, narcissism is in fact an inexhaustible source of energy. Compared with Europe, America has a strong economy; a liter of gasoline costs about 2.65 euros in the Netherlands (half of it tax), and 0.90 euros in America. Trump plays the lead role in world politics and relies on a loyal MAGA base at home.

In midterm elections turnout is usually low: the main task is getting your own supporters to the ballot box. At the same time, the Democrats have radicalized to the left and in some states are fielding candidates who are too radical even for an average Democrat. Dutch journalists often take their cues from CNN, but that is a “mini-channel” compared with the conservative FOX News. Then there is the Trump factor: he is campaigning in all the swing states, for every vote.

Everything is close. Republicans are often “under-polled,” as the 2024 presidential election showed once again; they distrust pollsters. The Republicans have a reasonable chance of keeping the Senate; the House of Representatives is neck and neck.

It will be nail-biting at the Dutch television panels. Will it be a bonfire of joy or (once again) a vale of tears?

Written by Derk Eppink Distinguished Fellow (Honorary), Gold Institute for International Strategy

One Year in Kurdistan: Brig. Gen. Ernie Audino on East to West

East to West Podcast thumbnail: The Kurds Were Betrayed?, with host Sarah Martinez Amir and Ernie Audino

This segment was hosted by Sarah Martinez Amir and aired on the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs’ East to West podcast. One Year in Kurdistan Changed How He Understood the Middle East.

Featuring Ernie Audino, Senior Military Fellow, Kurdistan Program (U.S. Chair), Gold Institute for International Strategy

In brief

Ernie Audino joins Sarah Martinez Amir on the Jerusalem Center’s East to West podcast to discuss what a year embedded with the Kurdish Peshmerga taught him about Iran and the Middle East.

From the Jerusalem Center’s description: “What did a year fighting alongside Kurdish forces in Iraq teach a U.S. Army officer about Iran and the Middle East? Brigadier General Ernest C. Audino, a 28-year U.S. Army veteran who spent a year embedded with the Kurdish Peshmerga, joins Sarah Martinez Amir.”

Watch the full segment at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs’ East to West podcast

Ernie Audino is a Senior Military Fellow at the Gold Institute for International Strategy, a Washington, D.C. foreign policy and defense think tank.